Immigrants Reject Quebec’s Separatists

Immigrants Reject Quebec’s Separatists
Christinne Muschi/Reuters

Article Tools Sponsored By
By CHRISTOPHER MASON
Published: May 20, 2007

VERDUN, Quebec — As cultural coordinator for a resource center for new Quebecers, Gabriel Garcia is leading an effort to bridge the gap between the growing number of immigrants here and the mostly French-speaking society into which they have moved.

But one issue is proving to be a bridge too far for the province’s first-generation immigrant population: the long struggle for independence. “I realize it is important for many,” said Mr. Garcia, who mainly works with people from Central and South America, voicing a sentiment shared by almost all the recent immigrants. “But for me, sovereignty is not my primary passion.”

The number of immigrants entering Quebec each year has nearly doubled since the last referendum on independence in 1995 failed by a razor-thin margin, and immigrants now represent more than 10 percent of the electorate.

That rapidly expanding demographic consists of people who have no historical stake in the traditional French-English divide. The evolving society is one of many challenges facing the political vehicle of the separatist movement, the Parti Québécois, after the resignation on May 8 of the party’s leader, André Boisclair.

Mr. Boisclair, 41, became increasingly unpopular during his 18 months at the party’s helm, especially after elections in March when the Parti Québécois finished in third place, its worst showing in more than 30 years.

Although French-speaking Quebecers continue to form a clear majority of the population, the growing number of immigrants, along with a greatly reduced birthrate, point to a shift that is forcing political parties, separatist and federalist, to rethink their political foundations.

“Immigrants who come from outside during their adult life choose Canada,” said Pierre Martin, a political scientist at the University of Montreal. “They’ve immigrated to Canada, and those who choose sovereignty are a relatively limited number.”

One such immigrant is Aymar Missakila. He came to Quebec from the Congo Republic in 1994, just as tensions were building in the period before a referendum on independence the next year.

Having come from a politically unstable country, Mr. Missakila said that at the time he did not understand why a province whose economy and social programs seemed strong would want to separate from the rest of Canada.

“I understand fighting for a bigger role for Quebec, but I don’t believe sovereignty is the issue,” said Mr. Missakila, 35, who works at a race-relations organization in Montreal. “Many immigrants think a sovereign Quebec would not be good for the economy, the health care system and immigrant issues.”

But economists say Quebec has little choice but to embrace the immigrants because of a plummeting native birthrate that would otherwise reduce economic growth. Even with a birthrate well below the rate of replacement, Quebec’s population grew 4.3 percent from 2001 to 2006, to 7.5 million.

“Quebec has gone from having the highest birthrate in the country to one of the lowest in one generation, so any growth in the work force is going to come from new Quebecers,” said Glen Hodgson, chief economist at the Conference Board of Canada, a nonprofit group in Ottawa. “How far is Quebec willing to go to accommodate those new to Quebec?”

Some contend that replacing Mr. Boisclair will allow the Parti Québécois to revive itself. But changing demographics and more accepting attitudes toward the rest of Canada suggest that the Parti Québécois will have a difficult time swaying a majority of voters in favor of independence.

“We may be finding that the P.Q. was the party of a generation,” said Jocelyn Létourneau, a professor at Laval University in Quebec and the author of “What Do the Québécois Really Want?”

“Those who grew up in the 1960s,” she said, “they had this project, independence, which they now have a hard time selling to the majority of Quebecers.”

Instead, an upstart party, the Action Démocratique du Québec, emerged in the March election, making an ambiguous promise of greater autonomy for Quebec within Canada. That pledge, paired with a mostly right-wing platform, pushed the party into second place, close behind the provincial governing party, the federalist Liberal Party.

The reshaped political landscape poses an interesting situation for the conservative prime minister, Stephen Harper. A weakened independence movement and a possible ally in the Action Démocratique du Québec mean that, for the first time, federalist politicians in Ottawa have a potential alliance of parties in Quebec to counter the Parti Québécois.

“We have a federalist government in Quebec City, and we have an official opposition that doesn’t want a referendum,” Mr. Harper told reporters. “So obviously we will look forward to working with the government of Quebec.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/20/world/americas/20canada.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

___________________________________________________

Les immigrants vont comprendre davantage notre situation s’ils connaissent notre histoire, s’il parle la langue de Molière. Connaître la langue française et vous subissez les inégalités qu’il y a entre la nation québécoise et la nation canadienne. Comme disait un Esdras Minville sur le bilinguisme « tant que nous n’aurons pas entrepris de former les esprits par l’intérieur en les soumettant à une forme d’éducation qui tienne compte de leur génie propre (à la culture), de tout leur être, ce fatras demeurera à l’état de fatras, vague poussière jetée à la surface des cerveaux, destinée à se volatiliser aux premiers frottements avec les réalités de la vie. Nous continuerons à produire quelques rares érudits, sans relief, ni personnalité, à travers une multitude de phonographes au mécanismes interchangeable à volonté; mais nous ne produirons jamais un homme cultivé ni un Canadien-français digne de lui-même, digne du magnifique patrimoine spirituel qu’il a reçu en héritage. Et puisque, malgré tout, nous éprouvons encore les jours d’exaltation patriotique, le besoin de nous proclamer « fils spirituels du pays de Bossuet, de Racine et de Corneille,» que le simple bon sens nous détermine donc enfin à nous élever de la vanité redondante à la fierté constructrice, à nous préparer des successeurs qui témoignent de cette glorieuse filiation autrement que par de creuses paroles : par la vigueur de leur tempérament et par la puissance de leur vie.»

BOUTILLER G. et MEYNAUD J., Le choc des langues au Québec 1760-1970, Les presses de l’université du Québec, 1972, p.767
_________________
Julien fut étonné de ce qu’il avait fait. Ce n’est rien, se dit-il, il faudra en venir à bien d’autres injustices, si je veux parvenir, et encore savoir les cacher sous de belles paroles sentimentales [...]. C’est lui qui méritait la croix, c’est moi qui l’ai. Et je dois agir dans le sens du gouvernement qui me la donne. -Stendhal- Le Rouge et le Noir